|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
The dark cloud
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
1060
   |
Posted - 2012.12.18 19:20:00 -
[1] - Quote
Yes the time off modded controller scrubs is over. And now i say something what other people are saying about missile launchers:
Its fine now how it is, no further change needed.
(Starts melting faces with the Viziam Laser rifle on long range where you can do crap about it) |
The dark cloud
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
1060
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 22:03:00 -
[2] - Quote
Higgs flagrantfool wrote:The dark cloud wrote:Yes the time off modded controller scrubs is over. And now i say something what other people are saying about missile launchers:
Its fine now how it is, no further change needed.
(Starts melting faces with the Viziam Laser rifle on long range where you can do crap about it) I dont use a modded controller
Like i care. Now you feel the same way like the people who used missile launchers. Well suck it you wont get your tac AR back. And im happy that CCP decided to go with the recoil soloution that i offered them. |
The dark cloud
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
1060
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 23:04:00 -
[3] - Quote
Higgs flagrantfool wrote:
I was adapted before this bull**** happened I'm a proto LAR user. This still does not excuse what they have done to the TAR.
Well you better adapt then again. Well now we have the following list of useless weapons/turrets:
-Breach AR
-Tac AR
-Large Missile turrets
-Small Missile turrets
-Smal railguns
-Smal blasters
-Active scanners
This fix was needed to punish modded controller users. You can thank the imperfects for that and their modded controllers. And people where laughing at me when i sayd that you would do a backflip with the tactical AR when recoil gets added. Well who is laughing now?  |
The dark cloud
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
1060
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 01:20:00 -
[4] - Quote
Cerebral Wolf Jr wrote:
Yeah DC because you're the only person on the entire game that suggested this fix, you really are a fuckwit you know that? I love SI and Sha but you really are a waste of space and don't think before you type.
The AR recoil change is very welcome by me, it was much needed however i do believe that the tac rifles need a slight deduction in recoil. They are meant to be specialist, medium/long range, single shot, high damage AR's. I think they need either a reduction in recoil or a buff to damage because it's very, very difficult to keep the tac point on something now as a single shot alone raises the scope way off target and obviously if it's a moving target you can't kill anything.
I'm all for having a sensible discussion about this but it's not going to happen while idiots keep trolling AR users and AR users keep crying and not posting anything constructive.
Mission accomplished. again i proofed that as long you moan about something it will get nerfed. And it wasnt just me who complained about this. And no im against a reduction of recoil simply so that your modded controllers are WASTED money. If you want the old TAC AR back then i want my old missile launchers back. Fair deal i would say dont ya agree? And there is no room of discussion about it cause only those people complain now are the players who have modded controllers. A minority on this game. And guess what? Majority>minority that simple. Well i could aswell go on here and moan that my Elm-7 laser rifle now overheats but i dont do that cause i accept the change and its fine with me. |
The dark cloud
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
1060
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 03:06:00 -
[5] - Quote
Cerebral Wolf Jr wrote:
First of all whats your point about things getting nerfed? You're saying you're happy that the AR's got nerfed but you're also saying you was just trying to prove that people who ***** get what they want. So what's your point? AR's needed nerfing or that CCP only listen to people that moan?...
It don't matter if you personally are against a reduction in recoil for TAC's as its not your decision and you don't use them, you use laser rifles, you sound like you're only against it because it gives you an advantage not because you want to balance things correctly. The fact is that as i said, AR did need adjusting and all I'm saying now is that the TAC has been hit too hard and it's unusable, that's more than a balance issue isn't it?...
I can't comment on missile launchers because i didn't use them before or after the changes so it wouldn't be right for me to talk about something i know little about, maybe you could learn from that lesson eh?...
Why do you think that only people use the TAC use modded pads? I was taking a break for a long time while people realised it was possible to abuse the TAC with modded pads and now i'm back i'm using the TAC again without a modded pad because i didn't even realise it was possible till recently, are you that dense that you can't see people using a TAC without using a modded pad? Are you that closed minded? Funny that someone who's apparently a PR guy for a well known corp is so closed minded and such an idiot, maybe you was chose for the job because of how stupid you are? Maybe the plan was to use you just to get fights?
Now if you want to have an actual discussion, like an adult, using facts and figures and not opinions and hear say then you're welcome to, other wise shut up trying to talk about something you've no idea what it is.
im not stupid i plan every post i make. But oh well have fun with your "new" breach AR variant called TAC AR. When CCP is making a change then it is for good. And let me tell you something how missiles worked before and after the nerf.
Blast radius before nerf: 5m
after the nerf: 2m
this is much less then a normal locus grenade would do. Even mass drivers have a bigger blast radius. And hitting people directly is not a option because of the tracking time that missiles have. So they are easy to avoid. Well back to the TAC AR "WHY U NERF MY GUN" topic:
I suggestet multiple ways to deal with people who abuse them. Like reducing the rate of fire
(789 RPM which is higher then a normal AR would do), reducing the clip size and some other options. The community back then decided to go with the "more kick" variant and this is what you get. It wasnt my decision nor CCP's it was that what the community demanded. Im just simply laughing cause now you feel the same way how vehicle users feel. I call it justice.
And i think im going to handle problematic things in the game just like that in the future. Make a post, offer multiple ways to handle them, community chooses what they think is the best and then it comes in effect. |
The dark cloud
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
1060
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 20:48:00 -
[6] - Quote
Cerebral Wolf Jr wrote:Jack flagrantfool wrote:Death On Contact wrote:I love modded control loser tears!
GÖá Death On Contact I'm not a modded controller user jack@$$. Says that several times throughout the thread *faceplam* Man where do these people come from. It's just pubbies thinking they good trolls when really they just copy some of the better ones and hope for the same reaction. Just report his posts as flame baiting/trolling and get him banned from posting. Works for me. I think the KB/M is in fact easier to use than pad based on the feedback i've had from several people. I think reduced recoil, reduced ammo capacity, cut ROF by 50% and buff DPS by 25% would fix it fine. Keeps it as a LR, skilled weapon for AR users, stops modded pads from working , makes it useless up close but allows people to still get kills with it so long as they are clever and pick their fights which is what the weapon is all about.
increase DPS by 25%? Are you nuts? Then you could drop people even faster then before and we have a worse situation. The only way to increase DPS is either increase the damage or the ROF. And last time ive checked the TAC AR has the highest damage of all AR's. So no to more damage.
|
|
|
| |
|